ከም ዝፍለጥ ኣብ 2014 ኣቐዲሙ ዝወጸ መጠንቀቕታ ምንባሩ ዝዝከር’ዩ።እዚ ተዳጋጋሚ ዝወጽእ ዘሎ መጠንቀቕታ ተግባራዊ ንክኸውን በይ-ኤርያ ኤርትራውያን ንደሞክራሲያዊ ለውጢ: ነዚ ጉዳይ ብዕቱብ ሒዙ ምስ ዝምልከቶም ኣካላት ሰብ መዚ ኢምግረሽንን ሆምላንድ ሰኩሪቲን (department immigration and homeland security) ብምትሕብባር: ነቶም መሰል ዑቕባ ሓቲቶም ክነሶም 2% ዚኸፍሉን ናብ ዓዲ ዝመላለሱን ንምልላይን ስጉምቲ ንምውሳድን ዕዉት ስራሕ የሳላሰል ኣሎ።

ነቲ ናይ 2014 መጥንቀቕታ ሸለል ብምባል ንዝሃብኩሞ ማሕላ ኪሕድኩም፡ ተመሊስኩም ምስቲ ኣደዳ መከራን ስደትን ዝገበረኩም ስርዓት ክትዳናገጹን ክትተሓጋገዙን ሕጊ እዚ ትነብርሉ ሃገርን ሕጊ ስደተኛታት ዓለም ዝጥሕስ ገበን ትፍጽሙ ምህላውኩም ክትግዘቡ ይግባእ። ስለ ዝኾነ ድማ ብሕጊ’ቲ ትነብርሉ ሃገር ናይ መንበሪ ፍቃድ ወረቀትኩም ናይ ምሕዳግን ክሳብ ናይ ምጥራዝ ናብ ኤርትራ ከም ዘሎ ትዝንግዕዎ የብልኩምን። ድሮ ውን ሃገራት ኤሮጳ (European countries) ከም በዓል ስዊዘርላንድን ሆላንድን ነዚ መስርሕ ጀሚረንኦ ከም ዘለዋን ብዙሓት ሓተቲ ዑቕባ ኤርትራውያን: ደገፍትን ተደናገጽትን ስርዓት ህግደፍ ድማ ግዳይ ኮይኖም ኣለዉ።

ኣብ ከምዚ ኩነታት ከይትበጽሑን፣ ምእንቲ ፍትሕን ሓቅን ደው ክትብሉን  ኣብ ዝሓለፈ መጠንቀቕታ ተገሊጹ ኔሩ’ዩ። እቶም ንዝተዋህበኩም ምኽርን ማዕዳን ነጺግኩም ደድሕርቲ ዓማጺ ስርዓት ተዳኽሩ ዘለኹም ዕድመ፡ ጾታ ብዘየገድስ ከነጋልጸኩም ምኻና ደጊምና ነተሓሳስብ። ኣብዚ ሃገር ዑቕባ ዝተዋህበኩም ምኽንያት ብስርዓት ህግደፍ ግፍዒ፣ ስቓይ፣ መከራን ሽግር ስለ ዝበጻሓኩምን ከምሰብ ድማ ምንባር ስለ ዝተኸልከልኩምን ኢኹም:: ነዚ ሓቀኛ እኩይ ባህሪ ናይቲ ስርዓት ገሊጽኩም ናይ ዕቁባ መሰልኩም ረኺብኩም ከትብቅዑ ግን: ነቲ ንማሕላኹም ኣሚኑ ከም ሰብ ዘዕቆበኩም ህዝብን ሃገርን ሕጉ ኣክቢርኩም ክትነብሩ ትጽውዑ ኣለኹም::

ብፍላይ መንእሰያት: እዚ ኩሉ ሓሶትን ጥልመትን ብዋጋ እቶም ከማኻትኩም ምንባር ምስ-ሰኣኑ  ሃጽ ኢሎም ነዚ ንስኻትኩም ረኺብኩሞ ዘለኩም ዕድል ንምርካብ ግን ድማ ከይበጽሕዎ ዕደመ ንእስነቶምን ክብርቲ ሂወቶምን ንቡር ቀብሪ’ኻ ከይረኸቡ ብዓሳታት ባሕርን ኣሞራታት ሳህራን ዝተበልዑ መዛንኩም ፣ብዋጋቶም እንተስ  ትሕዝቶ ሓጺርዎም ወይ ዕድል ተዓጺዎም መዋእሎም ሓለውቲ ድፍዕን፣ ግዳያት ማእሰርትን ሞትን ናይቲ ስርዓት ዝኾኑ  ዘለዉ መንእሰያት የሕዋትኩም፡ ኣያታትኩምን ኣቦታትኩምን ምኻኑ’ዩ። እቶም ኣቦታትን ኣዴታትን ትብሃሉ’ውን ከማኻትኩም ወሊዶም እንከለዉ ብሰንኪ’ቲ ተሳስይዎ ዘለኹም ዓማጺ ሰርዓት ውሉዳቶም ስኢኖም ከይኣክል ነቲ ብማዕዶ ዝሰምዕዎ መርድእ ደቆም እኻ ንቡር ሓዘን ከይ ገብሩሎም ተኸልኪሎም ኣለዉ። እዚ ኩሉ ሓሳረ መከራ ወለዲ፡ ስቓይን ሞትን ውሉድ እንዳ ረኣኹም ሕልናኹም ሸጥኩም ምስዚ ውልከ-ምልኪ ስርዓት ተሳስዩ ብምህላውኩም ብታሪኽ ትሓተቲ ምኻንኩም ኣይትዘንግዑ። ብቐንዱ እቶም ካብ መንግስቲ ሓገዝ እንዳ ወሰድኩም፡ ነዚ ግብረ-ሽበራ ዚሙውል ስርዓት ህግደፍ 2% ትኸፍሉ፡ ሆም-ላንድ ሰኩሪቲ ምስ ኢምግረሽን ብምትሕብባር፡ ሓበሬታ ኣብ ምእካብ ከምዝርከብን በዚ ድማ ብዙሓት ግዳይ ናይ ወረቐት ምሕዳግን ምጥራዝን ክትኮኑ ምኻንኩም ክትርድእዎ ይግባእ። 

ብፍላይ እቶም ንፌስቲቫላትን፡ ባዓላትን፡ከምኡ’ውን ፕሮፕሮጋንዳዊ ስለያዊ  ሰርሓትን ተዋፊርኩም ነቲ ኣብ ዕርበተ ሞቱ ዝኸይድ ዘሎ ስርዓት ባላ ኮንኩም ትድግፍዎ ዘለኹም ዋጋ ጥልመት ውጹዕ ህዝቢ ትፍደይሉ ሰዓት ኣኺሉ ኣሎ። ናይዚ ኣብነት ድማ ኣቅድም ኣቢሉ ኣብ ስዊዘርላንድ፡ ሕጂ ድማ ኣብ ሆላንድ እቶም ዑቕባ ተዋሂብዎም ክነሶም ምስ ስርዓት ህግደፍ ዘውደኽድኹን ዓዲ ዝመላለሱን ኤረትራውያን ተለልዮም ናይ ዑቕባ ወረቐቶም ተሓዲጎም ናብ ኤርትራ ዝጥረዝሉ መዓልቲ ይቖጽሩ ኣለዉ። ኣብ ካሊፎርንያ ውን በይ-ኤርያ ኤርትራውያን ንደሞክራሲያዊ ለውጢ:  ዝርዝር ኣስማት ናይ 28 ኤርትራ በጺሖም ዝተመልሱ ሓተቲ ዑቕባ (ካብ ሳንሆዘን ከባቢኣን 8: ኦክላንድን ከባቢኣን 11: ሳንታሮዛ 6: ሳንፍራንሲስኮ ድማ 3) ናብ ሆም-ላንድ ሰኩሪቲ አረኪቡ ከምዘሎ ነፍልጥ። ድሮ ውን ኣስማቶም ኣብ ዳታበይዝ ተታሒዙ ናይ ምጽራይ ስራሕ ጀሚሮም ኣብ ምክትታሎም ይርከቡ። ከምዚኦም ዝኣመሰሉ ውልቀ ሰባት ንፈልጥ እንተ ኮይና ድማ ምእንቲ ከነቃልዖም ምሉእ ሓብሬታ ብምስዳድ ክትተሓባበሩና ብትሕትና ንሓትት።

ስለዚ እዞም ሓተቲ ዑቕባ ዝኾንኩም ኤርትራውያን ካብ ፈስቲባላት ህግደፍ ምስታፍን 2% ካብ ምኽፋልን ክትቁጠቡን: ምስቲ ስርዓት ዘለኩም ርክብ ብምብታኽ ምስ ህዝብኹም ክትውግኑ ትጽውዑ ኣለኹም። እንተ ዘይኮይኑ ግን ከም ቀደም ይመስለኪን ውሕጅ ይወስደክን ስለዝኮነ፡ ካብ ደሓር ዋይዋይ ሕጂ ኢደካን እግርኻን ምእካብ ትሕሸኩም።    

ሞት ንዓመጽቲ: ሰላምን ፍትሕን ንህዝቢ ኤርትራ!!  
በይ-ኤርያ ኤርትራውያን ንደሞክራሲያዊ ለውጢ

ርእሰ-ዓንቀጽ ሰዲህኤ

ዝምድና ብዙሕ መልክዕን መንቀልን ኣለዎ። ንኣብነት ናይ ስጋ ዝምድና ኣሎ። ካብዚ ሓሊፉ ኣብ ረብሓ ዝተመስረተ ናይ ሓቢርካ ምስራሕ ዝምድና እውን ኣሎ። ንሕና ኣብዚ ንዛረበሉ ዘለና ዝምድና ግና ናይ ዕላማን መትከልን ዝምድና እዩ ክኸውን። ሓደ ጉዳይ ንምፍጻም ክትበገስ እንከለኻ እሞ ውጽኢቱ ናይ ሓባር ክኸውን እንከሎ ዝምድና ፈጢርካ ዓቕሚ ብምድላብ ምንቅስቓስ ተመራጺ እዩ። ኣብዚ ምስ መን ትዛመድ ኣብ ምምራጽን ምውሳንን ጥንቁቕ ምዃን ውጽኢት እቲ ዝምድና ኣድማዒ ንክኸውን ወሳኒ እዩ።

መዛምድቲ ክትመርጽ እንከለኻ ኣብ ግምት ከተእትዎ ካብ ዝግበኣካ ረቛሒታት፡ እቲ መዛምድትኻ ካብቲ ዝፍጠር ዝምድና ተጠቃሚ ምዃኑን ዘይምዃኑን ምርግጋጽ እዩ። ብዘይካዚ ነዚ ረብሓኡ ከረጋግጽ ክዛመደካ ቅሩብ ምዃኑን ዘይምዃኑን ምድህሳስ’ውን ካልእ ኣገዳሲ ቅድመ-ኩነት እዩ። እንዳ ጸዋዕካዮ ጸማም እዚ ምስ ዝህበካ ምዝማድ ስለ ዘይከኣል። እዚ ዘርእየና ድማ ዝምድና ዝድልድልን ቀጻልነት ዝህልዎን እቶም ዝምስርትዎ ተዛምደቲ ካብቲ ዝምድና ማዕረ ተጠቀምቲ ምዃኖም እንተ ኣሚኖም ጥራይ ምዃኑ እዩ። ካብዚ ሓሊፉ ዝምድና ካብቶም ተዛመድቲ ነቲ ሓደ ኣካል ጥራይ ዝጠቅምን ዝብህጎን ጌርካ ክምስረት ኣይክእልን እዩ። እንተተፈተነ’ውን ፋይዳን ቀጻልነትን ክህልዎ ኣይክእልን።

ዝምድና ነናትካ ረብሓ ጥራይ ከተዕውት ብምውጣን ዝረጋገጽ ኣይኮነን። ብኣንጻሩ ዝምድና ናትካ ረብሓ ጥራይ ዘይኮነስ ናይ መዛምድትኻ ተጠቃምነት’ውን ኣብ ግምት እንዳእተኻ ዝረጋገጽ እዩ። ምናልባት ግና ዝምድና ከም ዝኾነ ተረኽቦ ብመስርሕ ክብ ለጠቕ ስለ ዝጐዓዝ እቲ ካብቲ ዝምድና ዝርከብ ረብሓ ብዝተወሰነ ደረጅኡ ንዝተወሰነ መድረኽ ናብቲ ሓደ ወገን ካብቶም ተዛመድቲ ናይ ምዝዛው ባህሪ ክህልዎ ይኽእል። እቲ ምዝዛው ኩሉ ግዜ ናብቲ ሓደ ኣቕጣጫ ጥራይ ዘይኮነ ክቀያየር ይኽእል።

ዝምድና ኣድላይነቱ ስለ ዝተራእየ ሃንደፍ ኢልካ ዝእቶ ዘይኮነስ ኣጽኒዕካ እትሕዞ መስርሕ እዩ። እቲ ዝምድና ምእንቲ ክድልድልን ክቕጽልን ሕድገት እትገብረሎም ጉዳያትን ኣብ ትሕቲ ዝኾነ ይኹን ኩነታት ምእንቲ ዝምድና ኢልካ ዘይትዕጸፈሎም ንህልውናኻ ዝፈታተኑ ጉዳያት ኣለሊኻ ምእታው የድሊ። እዚ ደቂቕ ሕሳብን ጥንቃቐን ብኹሎም ተዛመድቲ ወገናት ዝረአ እዩ።  ካብዚ ብምብጋስ ከምቲ ንስኻ ምእንቲ ዝምድና ኢልካ ኣብ ዋጋ ዕዳጋ ከተውርዶም ዘይግበኣካ ኣዕኑድ ዝህልዉኻ ኣብቲ  መዛምድትኻ እውን ከምኡ ከምዝህሉ ምግንዛብ ከኣ የድሊ። ካብዚ ብምንቃል ካብ መዛምድትኻ እትጽበዮ ሕድገት’ውን ኣቐዲምካ ምግማት ይከኣል። ካብኡ ንላዕሊ ክትደፍኦ ተሃቂንካ፡ መዛምድትኻውን እውን ከምኡ ደፊኡ ናብቲ ናቱ ረብሓ ከእትወካ ተፈቲኑ፡ እቲ “ማዕረ ተጠቃምነት” ዝብል መትከል ዝምድና ስለ ዝህሰ እቲ ዝምድና እውን ኣብ ሓደጋ ክወድቕ ይኽእል። ምኽንያቱ ምዝማድ ማለት ኩለንተናኻ ሓደ ምዃን ማለት ዘይኮነስ ንፍልልያት ቦታኦም ኣትሒዝካ ኣብቶም ንክልቴኻ ዘርብሑ ምስራሕ ማለት ምዃኑ ግንዛበ ሰለ ዘድልዮ። እዚ ኣብ መንጎ ውድባት ጥራይ ዘይኮነ ኣብ መንጎ መንግስታት’ውን ክረአ እንዕዘቦ እዩ።

ዝምድና ነዊሕ ዝጠመተን ኣብ መሰረታዊ ጉዳያት ዘትከለን እምበር ኣብ መሰረታዊ ዘይኮኑ ጉዳያት ኣትኪሉ ከም መፍትሒ ግዚያዊ ጸገም ጥራይ ክረኣይ ኣይግባእን። እዚ ማለት ግና ኣብቶም ተዛመድቲ ብግዳም ይኹን ብውሽጢ ብዝፍጠር ምዕባለ ዝምድና ኣይቅየርን ምናልባት እውን ኣይቋረጽን ማለት ኣይኮነን። ብመንጽር እዚ እዩ ከኣ “ቀዋሚ ጐርቤት እምበር ቀዋሚ ዓርኪ የለን” ዝበሃል። ኣብ ብዙሕ ኣጋጣሚታት ከም ዝረአ ዝምድና ውጽኢቱ ኣብ ሓጺር ግዜ ዝሕፈስ ዘይኮነስ ኣዕኲዅካ ኣብ ፍረ ንምብጽሑ ነዊሕ ግዜ ዝወስድ ክኸውን ይኽእል። ስለዚ ዝምድና ዝድልድል ብትዕግስቲ፡ ጹረትን ንመሰረታዊ መትከልካ ብዘይፍሑቕ ሕድገት ብምግባርን እምበር ብታህዋኽን ነዓይ ጥራይ ይጥዓመንን ኣይኮነን።

ዝምድና ኣብ መንጎ ነናቶም መትከላት ዘለዎም ክልተን ካብኡ ንላዕን ኣካላት ዝፍጠር ስለ ዝኾነ ምዕዋቱ ቀሊል ኣይኮነን። ምኽኝያቱ ክትዛመድ እንከለኻ፡ ብዛዕባ ናትካ መትከላትን ዕላማን ጥራይ ዘይኮነ ብዛዕባ ናይ መዛምድትኻ’ውን ክትሓስብ እንትግደደሉ ስለ ዝኾነ። ዝምድና ክሰፍሕን ክጸብብን ይኽእል። እዚ ኣብ ስፍሓትን ጽበትን ናይቲ ምስ መዛምድትኻ ዘራኽበካ ነጥብታት ዝምርኮስ እዩ። ኣብ መንጎ ተዛመድቲ ዘሎ ኩለመዳያዊ ፍልልይ ሚዛን ሓይሊ’ውን ንዝምድና ይጸልዎ’ዩ።

ሰልፊ ደሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ፡ ምስ ዝተፈላለዩ ኤርትራዊ ናይ ለውጢ ሓይልታት  ዘራኽብዎ ነጥብታት ከም ዘለዉዎ ይኣምን። ኣብዚ እምነትዚ ኣትኪሉ ክዛመድ እሞ ምስ መዛምድቱ ኮይኑ ናይ ለውጢ ሓይሊ ከተርንዕ ከኣ ይሰርሕ። ካብዚ ሓሊፉ ምስ ገለ ወገናት፡ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ኣብ መጻኢት ኤርትራ ብዘጽድቖ ቅዋም ኣቢሉ ናይ መወዳእታ ብይን ተዘይሂብሎም ሕጂ ኣብ መስርሕ ዝምድና ውድባት ዘይውድኡ ፍልልያት ከም ዘለዉዎ’ውን ይርዳእ። ካብዚ ብምንቃል ሕጂ ዝገበሮ ዝምድና ኣብቶም ምስ መዛምድቱ ማዕረ ዝብጽሕዎ ዛዕባታት ምዃኑ ይግንዘብ። ንኣብነት ኣብ ምውዳቕ ወጻዒ ስርዓት ህግደፍን ናብ ቅዋማዊ መንግስቲ ዘብጽሕ ናይ ምስግጋር መድረኽ ምጥጣሕን።

MPs say it is unacceptable for Home Office to continue basing decisions on guidance acknowledged to be wrong

 Zecahrias, whose asylum claim was rejected, said he believed the Home Office was trying to deter Eritreans. Photograph: Kate Lyons

 

Thursday 28 July 2016 19.59 BST

Hundreds of asylum applications from Eritreans are being incorrectly refused by the government owing to its “unacceptable” policy on accepting refugees from the country, MPs have said.

The home affairs select committee has called on the Home Office to explain why it still has not updated its guidance on asylum seekers from Eritrea, even though it has acknowledged the guidance to be wrong.

The cross-party committee of MPs noted in a report published on Wednesday that 86% of appeals from Eritrean asylum seekers were decided in their favour in the first quarter of 2016.

“This suggests to us that the Home Office country guidance for Eritrea was wrong and applications for asylum from Eritrean nationals have been incorrectly refused,” said the report. “This is the third consecutive report in which we have commented on the approach of the Home Office to asylum-seeking Eritreans. It is unacceptable that the Home Office is still getting so many of its decisions regarding nationals of this country wrong.”

Until it controversially updated its country advice in March 2015, while Theresa May was home secretary, the Home Office advised that it was not safe to return most asylum seekers to Eritrea, which has been described as “the North Korea of Africa”. But the updated Home Office guidance claimed that citizens who left Eritrea without permission – many of them to escape its indefinite military service – would not face persecution if they returned.

The change of advice was based on a report, produced for the Danish government, that has since been discredited and from which the Danish government has distanced itself. One expert, who led an independent inquiry into the Home Office guidance, said in January that “an undergraduate would be failed” for producing such a document.

The home affairs committee said that where there were concerns over the accuracy of country guidance, as there were with Eritrea, the Home Office should “suspend decisions until such a time that those concerns have been investigated and, where necessary, revised guidance put in place”, or risk repatriating people to countries that were known to be unsafe or clogging up appeals courts unnecessarily.

In 2015, Eritreans accounted for the largest group of people applying for asylum in the UK, with 3,726 applications. The changed Home Office advice resulted in the number of Eritreans granted protection in the UK plummeting, from a 73% approval rate in the first quarter of 2015 to 34% in the second quarter.

However, the majority of these rejections are being overturned on appeal. In the first quarter of 2016, 86% of all appeals of Eritrean nationals were granted. This number is far higher than the appeal grant rate for other nationalities – the next highest successful appeal rate is for Iranians at 52%. The home affairs committee also suggested that the Home Office review its country advice on Iran, given that such a large number of decisions were being overturned on appeal.

The cost to the government of asylum appeals from Eritreans has risen by more than £5m since the change of country advice came into effect. An asylum claim costs an average of £1,300 to the government; this increases to £3,300 if the claim goes to appeal, according to the Ministry of Justice.

According to freedom of information data obtained by the Guardian, in the year before the country advice was changed (April 2014 to March 2015) there were 308 appeals of asylum decisions from Eritrean nationals, at a cost to the government of roughly £1m. In the year after the change of country advice (April 2015 to March 2016) there were 1,894 appeals by Eritreans, costing taxpayers £6.25m.

Zecahrias*, a 35-year-old Eritrean who came to the UK just after the Home Office guidance changed and had his initial asylum claim rejected, said he believed the Home Office was deliberately rejecting Eritreans to try to deter others from seeking asylum in Britain.

“They know what’s going on, they know the truth and we know what they are doing. Maybe the Home Office are saying, because we give them [asylum] easily, people are flowing to us, so if we reject them then people will not come,” he said.

Zecahrias was serving in the Eritrean military – as part of an indefinite mandatory military service scheme – when he left the country after learning that he was in danger of being arrested and possibly killed by the government. Zecahrias’s father was “disappeared” by the government in 2000 and the family have had no news of him in 15 years.

“I decided it’s better to do something and die than wait for them [to] kill me,” he said.

Zecahrias underwent a harrowing journey from Eritrea: he crossed the Sahara, was twice arrested in Libya and travelled in a boat for 15 hours on the Mediterranean. While he was in Libya he met his girlfriend, who is also a refugee. On arrival in the UK he thought he was safe.

“We believed the UK government is the best-organised, the one who was looking after human rights, who have the power to change everything and make it right,” he said.

When his asylum claim was rejected, Zecahrias’s girlfriend was pregnant and the news devastated him. He struggled to leave the house and lived in fear that the government would send him back to Eritrea, where he thought he would be arrested, if not killed.

“If the government of [the] UK was planning to take me back home on the plane, I was planning suicide,” he said. “It’s not what I was expecting when coming to England.”

He had his asylum claim granted on appeal, something he says is now expected by Eritrean asylum seekers. “I want to thank [the British government] for what they do,” said Zecahrias, who is now working in Leeds and supporting his girlfriend and son. “But they know the truth, they can solve this.”

“All country information and guidance is based on a careful and objective assessment of available evidence from a range of sources including the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, local, national and international organisations, and media outlets,” said a Home Office spokesperson.

“We continually review our country information and guidance to ensure it is up-to-date, accurate and relevant, so that staff can make fair and considered decisions.”

*Name has been changed

Source=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/28/hundreds-of-eritrea-asylum-applications-still-incorrectly-refused

يقول الفلاسفة إن من أهمية الخلاف أو التضاد أن ( الكون قائم علي تناقض الأشياء )، بمعنى آخر أنه لا وجود للكون بدون التناقض، إذاً أن نعيش مختلفين أمر وجودي، والخلاف أيضاً من جذور التعدُّد، فالتعدد والتباين قد يعود الي اختلاف الجنس ( النوع )، أسلوب التفكير، المعتقد، المصلحة...الخ.

التعدد والتباين يزين المجتمع كما تتزين الأرض بمختلف أنواع الزهور والنباتات، ولا يكون الاختلاف زينة إلا إذا أدير بحكمة واتزان. والإدارة الحكيمة لذلك التعدد لا تكون إلا بإدارته بما يضمن مصالح مكونات التعدد. فأي ميل جانبي أو أسلوب غير سوي في إدارة التعدد والاختلاف يحيل التعدد من زينة الي دمار شامل، أما الابتعاد عن الخلاف والتوجس منه واعتباره أمر خلاف وتباعد بين الناس فهو هروب من الواقع لا يجدي فتيلاً.

لدينا نحن الارتريين تعدد ينحدر منه الخلاف، فنحن متعددون دينياً، سياسياً، جغرافياً، عرقياً، نضالياً ( اختلاف التجربة النضالية )، وهذه كلها قابلة لأن تكون مصدراً للخلاف، لكن لو أدرنا تلك الاختلافات علي قاعدة المساواة، الحرية، العدل والنماء فستكون بالفعل زينةً وجمالاً، ولو أدرناها بالعكس فستستدير بنا الي العكس. ولكن لن يتحقق لنا ذلك إلا إذا رأينا لمن يختلف عنا بأكثر من عنصر للتعدد والاختلاف ما نراه لأنفسنا. وكل أنانية وحب للذات سوف يجعل من تعددنا وما ينتج عنه من خلافات واختلافات مصدراً للانهيار والتفتت بدلاً من الغني والجمال والتميز. علماً أن الحروب والمشكلات الناشئة في العديد من دول العالم اليوم منبعها هو الفشل في إدارة التعدد والاختلاف. وما المواجهة القائمة والمتطاولة بيننا ونظام الهقدف والخلافات العسيرة في أوساطنا كمعسكر معارضة إلا دليل علي فشلنا في إدارة تنوعنا. البعض يضع الكثرة العددية لمكونات المعارضة علي رأس عيوبها ومشاكلها. صحيح أن الكثرة السياسية والتنظيمية بهذه العددية غير المبررة أمر صادم للنفس، لكن المشكلة تعود الي عدم قدرتنا علي وضع الخلاف والتعدد ضمن عوامل القوة والبناء وليس عوامل الهدم والخلاف. لذا علي من يتهيبون الخلاف والتعدد أن يقتربوا من ساحته ليضعوه علي قضبان الطريق الصحيح والبنـَّــاء بدلاً من الهروب منه والتنكر له، إن الكثرة والتعدد لا تمنع أحداً من الاتفاق علي هدف مشترك والعمل علي تحقيقه، وهذا أسلوب نضالي ناجح ومجرب، ولا ننسى أننا في هذا العصر بالذات نعيش زمان التعدد والاختلاف، كما أن المحيط القريب والبعيد يعج بتجارب النجاح في حسن إدارة الخلاف والتعدد وعدم تجاهله.

في حديثنا عن الخلاف والتعدد لا ننسى أمراً من الأهمية بمكان، ألا وهو أن لا تنافس بدون وجود التعدد والخلاف، ولا وجود للتنافس دون وجود الأفكار المتباينة المتنافسة. انعدام التنافس يعني أن لا وجود لخيارات سياسية أو فكرية تقدم للشعب كي يختار من بينها ما يعجبه، وبالتالي يفرض عليه خيار أوحد شاء أم أبى. احترام تعدد خيارات الشعب يعني احترام تعدديته في أي مجال من المجالات. وكما أوضحنا آنفاً فإن حسن إدارة الخلاف والتعدد يجعل منهما زينة في عنق البلاد، وأن إتاحة الفرص أمام عملية التنافس أيضاً يستلزم وجود خيارات متعددة تنظمها قوانين البلاد. علي أن يكون التنافس حراً يضمن للمتنافسين فرص تنافس متكافئة.

إن تحويل الخلاف الي زينة مهمتنا جميعاً نحن الناشطين سياسياً وتنظيمياً، حيث العمل السياسي غالباً ما يكون مسرحاً للخلاف والتباين. ليس تلك مهمتنا فحسب، بل هذا ما يتوقعه منا الشعب الذي يتوقع منا الكثير. وما لم نحقق ذلك يجب أن نعترف أن بنا عيب أساسي يفرض علينا محاربته واستئصاله، علي أن لا يكون ذلك انطلاقاً مما تراه أنت فقط هو المعالجة الصحيحة لذلك العيب ومن ثم إهمال وجهة نظر الشركاء في معالجة العيب. يجب علينا أن نفتح أعيننا جيداً علي جانب الحقيقة الذي عند الآخر وأن نجتهد سوياً في إيجاد حقيقة وسطى جامعة للكل. وذلك بالطبع لا يكون باجتثاث التعدد والخلاف والرمي بهما في سلة المهملات، بل يكون بالسعي الي توسيع مساحة الاتفاق وتقليص شقة الخلاف خلال مسيرة العمل المشترك. هذا ما مرت به تجارب شعوب عديدة، لذا لا يمكن أن تتوقف مسيرته علي أبوابنا وتعطب عجلاته عندنا وتتعطل آلياته عن العمل، وعليه يجب أن نعمل معاً قبل أن يتسرب الوقت من بين أصابعنا، فالأيام كما يقولون حـُــبـَــالـَـى بكل جديد، ولا ضمان لنا أن يكون جديدها دوماً حابلاً بخير.